performance manager Archives - The Tall Cyclist https://www.thetallcyclist.com/tag/performance-manager/ Trying to See the Big Picture Tue, 01 Dec 2015 14:49:34 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5 42131507 Making Sense of Your Powermeter Data – Golden Cheetah https://www.thetallcyclist.com/making-sense-of-your-powermeter-data-golden-cheetah/ https://www.thetallcyclist.com/making-sense-of-your-powermeter-data-golden-cheetah/#respond Sun, 25 Nov 2012 09:00:00 +0000 http://www.thetallcyclist.com/?p=1174 In my previous post, I explained how the body responds to different type of exercise (physiological/training) stress. Improvement is based on that response. You need to be able to evaluate and quantify the stress you put your body through day after day as you train ie “How fit do I get after 1h riding at Z2 or […]

The post Making Sense of Your Powermeter Data – Golden Cheetah appeared first on The Tall Cyclist.

]]>
In my previous post, I explained how the body responds to different type of exercise (physiological/training) stress. Improvement is based on that response.

You need to be able to evaluate and quantify the stress you put your body through day after day as you train ie “How fit do I get after 1h riding at Z2 or Z3, 5x5min at Z5 etc.” You need to make sense of the mountains of data your powermeter records. First you need a software like Golden Cheetah (or WKO+ or Cycleops Power Agent). Second, there are a couple of terms that need explaining.

The Termninology Made Easy

How Hard for How long = Training Stress

This is the basic principle when it comes to analyzing the training stress you put your body through. How long as you probably guessed is easy to figure out.

How hard?

What is considered hard? In simple terms your human engine redline (or Functional Threshold Power – FTP) is the hardest you can sustain for 1 hour. Therefore for any given length of time, anything below that is less than 100% anything above is more than 100% effort.

When you go for a 1 hour ride, your bike computer records average power let’s say 200W. You have an FTP of 250W so by initial glance that 1 hour ride was certainly not too hard.

Although, the ride could have gone in a couple of ways.

  1. You rode nice and steady at 200W all the time (on a trainer or a flat road with no wind)
  2. You rode the first 30min leisurely at 150w and you decided to pick up the pace in the second 30min and rode 250W.
  3. In a criterium you were constantly slowing down and accelerating out of corners so your power looks something like 30s at 75W average and 30s at 325W for a full hour.

In all three cases your hour average is 200W. HOWEVER…

  1. You worked at about 80% of your max
  2. In that second 30min you worked quite hard (at your FTP)
  3. You went above your FTP quite often, really pushing it.

So how can you quantify how hard you worked in those three situations?

xPower (Normalized Power)

Power analysis software like Golden Cheetah (or WKO+) uses a term called xPower (Normalized Power). It is a mathematical formula that samples the data differently so it gives a better overview of the how hard you work during your training.

So if we go back to your 3 different 1 hour rides your xPower looks something like this

  1. 200W
  2. 225W
  3. 260W

Therefore xPower is the first metric when it comes to understanding how to analyze your power meter data. It is the better overview of “How hard?”

Relative Intensity

This is how your xPower relates to your FTP. When NP = FTP intensity is 1.

So…

How Hard x How Long = ????

So now that you understand the “How hard?” and “How long?” parts, we need a metric to put them together.

Golden Cheetah uses a metric called Bikescore to estimate your training stress based on your xPower. The higher the number the harder you worked that day. Therefore instead of tracking how many kilometers or how many hours you did in a a week, you can use Bikescore.

Improving Over Time

As you train you accumulate training stress (Bikescore), therefore you should be supercompensating in response and getting fitter. There is a formula that Golden Cheetah uses to estimate that supercompensation.

It boils down to two terms: Short Term Stress (STS) and Long Term Stress (LTS).

  • Short term stress (Fatigue): this represents your training stress averaged in the last 7 days.
  • Long Term Stress (Fitness): This is the training stress over 6 weeks (42 days). When you first  start training it is 0.

When you subtract STS from LTS you get Stress Balance (SB) or also known as Freshness.

Negative stress balance means that you are not fresh, however, to improve, your STS must be higher than LTS

Positive balance, means you are fresh.

In general fit and fresh is where you want to be at races.

It is a balance between Fatigue, Fitness and Freshness.

After some time you end up with a graph like this one. I will cover Golden Cheetah in detail in my next post.

STS (Pink), LTS (Blue), SB (Yellow), Bikescore (Purple bars)

A very popular and probably the first software to “put all that together” was WKO+. Although it uses different terms, the principle and the numbers behind it are very similar so for your convenience I am including a glossary of the terms WKO+ uses and their corresponding therms in Golden Cheetah.

WKO+ and Golden Cheetah glossary

Acute Training Load (ATL) = Short Term Stress (STS)

Chronic Training Load (CTL) = Long Term Stress (LTS)

Normalized Power (NP) = xPower

Stay tuned for my next post on Training With a Powermeter where I will cover knowing your way around Golden Cheetah.

Further Education and Staying in Touch

 

Like TheTallCyclist on Facebook and Subscribe via RSS or Email for future updates.

For further information check the ever -increasing Reading List

A drop of support means an ocean of gratitude.

If you find motivation and value in the content of TheTallCyclist, consider making a donation.




The post Making Sense of Your Powermeter Data – Golden Cheetah appeared first on The Tall Cyclist.

]]>
https://www.thetallcyclist.com/making-sense-of-your-powermeter-data-golden-cheetah/feed/ 0 1174
Season 2012 The Numbers https://www.thetallcyclist.com/season-2012-the-numbers/ https://www.thetallcyclist.com/season-2012-the-numbers/#respond Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:00:29 +0000 http://thetriplestripes.wordpress.com/?p=483 When you commit a lot of hours into a hobby such as cycling, it is nice to get tangible results. A great season or not what quite you hoped for, it is nice to have a good idea of why? The beauty of training with a power meter is that it forces you to keep […]

The post Season 2012 The Numbers appeared first on The Tall Cyclist.

]]>
When you commit a lot of hours into a hobby such as cycling, it is nice to get tangible results. A great season or not what quite you hoped for, it is nice to have a good idea of why?

The beauty of training with a power meter is that it forces you to keep a detailed training diary. The more data you have, the better. So at the end of season it is good to look back into the mountain of numbers and see what worked and what didn’t.

Below is the Golden Cheetah Performance Manager Chart following my 2012 cycling season. More detailed information on the terms can be found here. In general the chart describes the following: fatigue (pink), freshness (yellow), and overall fitness (blue), in addition the light pink bars represent how hard I worked each day.

Performance Manager Chart 2012 Season

The second image is a grayscale version of the first showing the periodization. The bulk of the training was Base training (green), followed by a Build phase (Yellow), finished off with a final Maintenance and Taper (red) for peak condition around the Bulgarian National Time Trial Championships. The last part represents rebuilding my base fitness (green) and taper again (red). For more information on training periodization click here:

Training Periodization

If you just consider the Performance Manager it looks like the perfectly scheduled season. Fitness went high while at the end I traded some fitness in order to get high freshness. However, there is more than meets the eye. Below you can see the relationship between my season fitness (blue) together with what Golden Cheetah calls Aerobic Power (5,10,20,30,60min peak power).  Addtionally you can see that my Functional Threshold Power changed from 325W to 350W mid season and all the training zones shifted accordingly. You can see that the overall trend for the Aerobic Power peaks is going down weeks before I was supposed to be peaking while fitness remains high…***

Aerobic Power vs Fitness

Hmmm…Why is that?? During the Build period intensity went high as expected, combined with a race or more every week required me to take more rest days, therefore the time spent riding was lower as shown in this next graph. What happens when you take days off and train less? That’s correct, you lose some of your condition. This is sometimes wrongly attributed as “peaking too early.” As described in my engine analogy here, you simply lose volume so as that happens you have to work harder to obtain the same power, until you need to work way past the redline.

Duration (green) vs Intensity (orange)

On the positive side you can see that the last part of the season although I had lower fitness, my Aerobic Power was close to the levels at the end of the previous period. Base training paid off.

Next season, my racing calendar would look similar, so couple of things I would pay attention to:

1. Maintain my Aerobic Fitness once intensity becomes high; 1x2h at low intensity weekly should be sufficient, maybe even replace a higher intensity training.

2. Specificity; my priority goal was a TT, so I should train towards than one event, including practice time trials instead of focusing on fitness alone.

***Right at this time I switched from a Powertap to an SRM power meter. I found it strange that numbers were becoming lower (the SRM should be ~5% higher because it has no chain friction losses as compared to a hub power meter). I naively attributed the downward pattern to possible calibration issues.

Conclusions

  • Base training is immensily important
  • If you want to improve you need to learn from experience and yes, from mistakes.
  • It is a constant feedback between you, the power meter and the data. Data should be viewed as a whole.
  • Trends sometimes start unnoticed and cannot be fully evaluated until the dataset is complete (at the end of season for example). Therefore past experience and knowledge already out there is important. If you start noticing decline in power numbers over time, go back and reevaluate what is your training lacking? Are you overtraining? Are you recovering enough? Are you sick?
  • Trends can and do explain your performance. Numbers don’t lie!

A drop of support means an ocean of gratitude.

If you find motivation and value in the content of TheTallCyclist, consider making a donation.




The post Season 2012 The Numbers appeared first on The Tall Cyclist.

]]>
https://www.thetallcyclist.com/season-2012-the-numbers/feed/ 0 483